Home

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession type defects

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised

Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized

Root coverage procedures for treating single and multiple recession-type defects: An updated Cochrane systematic review. Leandro Chambrone, evaluated the efficacy of different root coverage (RC) procedures in the treatment of single and multiple gingival recessions (GR).. Request PDF | Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects | Gingival recession is a term that designates the oral exposure of the root surface due to a.

UCL Discovery is UCL's open access repository, showcasing and providing access to UCL research outputs from all UCL disciplines Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised and multiple recession-type defects Review question The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of different surgical procedures to cover exposed tooth roots, when the gum tissue has receded away from the tooth

Root‐Coverage Procedures for the Treatment of Localized

SCTGs, coronally advanced flaps alone or associated with other biomaterial, and GTR may be used as root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects. In cases where. Root coverage surgery is usually used in lieu of restorative cervical bonding of teeth with noncarious cervical lesions and shallow cervical caries. When a tooth needs root coverage and restorative treatment, restorative procedures should be performed first (if possible) to eliminate caries and stabilize the tooth Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of different root-coverage procedures in the treatment of recession-type defects.This review is the main article of a research project designed to explore the effects of the PPS procedures in the treatment of recession-type defects via systematic reviews

Plain language summary: Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised and multiple recession‐type defects Review question The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of different surgical procedures to cover exposed tooth roots, when the gum tissue has receded away from the tooth Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. You can find out more about our use of cookies in About Cookies, including instructions on how to turn off cookies if you wish to do so

Volume 81 • Number 4 Review Root-Coverage Procedures for the Treatment of Localized Recession-Type Defects: A Cochrane Systematic Review Leandro Chambrone,* Fla´via Sukekava,*† Maurı´cio G. Arau´jo,† Francisco E. Pustiglioni,* Luiz Armando Chambrone,‡ and Luiz A. Lima* Background: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of different root-coverage procedures in. Root coverage (RC, in percentage) was calculated by the following formula: 2.4. Decision Tree. In the course of treating deep GR defects, the primary author (JBCN) has been following a defined step-by-step decision-making algorithm (Figure 1).The first step is to determine the anticipated GM displacement necessary to cover the defect in relation to the remaining vestibular depth A critical summary of Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 2010;81(4):452-478.

(PDF) Root coverage procedures for treating localised and

Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 2010; 81 : 452-478. Article Google Schola Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Treatment of Multiple Recession‐Type Defects. Luiz Armando Chambrone.

1. Introduction. Gingival recession (GR) is defined as the displacement of the gingival margin to the apical side of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) [].It usually triggers predisposition to root caries, dental hypersensitivity, and inadequate control of dental biofilm formation and loss of periodontal attachment [].GR implies aesthetic and functional problems with evidence of progress over. There is little documentation regarding the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results obtained with a connective tissue graft placed. Leandro Chambrone, Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega, Flávia Sukekava, Roberto Rotundo, Kalemaj Zamira, Jacopo Buti and Giovan Paolo Pini Prato, Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3, (2018) Purpose of Review The demand for root coverage in multiple gingival recession defects has increased in recent years. Compared to isolated recession, multiple gingival recession defects are much more challenging due to various limiting factors and require more sophisticated surgical techniques. This review aims to address recent progress in the management of multiple recession defects. Recent. RESULTS The two bilaminar techniques resulted in a high percentage of root coverage (97.3% in the test and 94.7% in the control group) and complete root coverage (gingival margin at the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ)) (86.7% in the test and 80% in the control teeth), with no statistically significant difference between them

Root Coverage Procedures for Treating Single and Multiple

  1. recession defect. It assures optimum root coverage results, good colour blending of the treated area and recuperation of original morphology of the soft tissue margin can be predictably accomplished by this technique. The coronally advanced flap is very effective technique in treating multiple recession defects affecting adjacent teeth and.
  2. Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Issue 2 : CD007161. Google Schola
  3. 1. Chmbrone et al. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: A Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 2010;81:452-478. 2. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 1972;43:623-627. 3. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2):CD007161, 15 Apr 2009 Cited by: 15 articles | PMID: 19370675. Revie Background: This paper aims to create a bridge between research and practice by developing a practical, extensive, and clinically relevant study that translates evidence-based findings on soft tissue root coverage (RC) of recession-type defects to daily clinical practice. Methods: This review is prepared in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and.

Surgical Therapies for the Treatment of Gingival Recession

  1. The amount of root coverage that can be achieved regardless of the procedure used is limited by the height of the adjacent papilla. Miller stated that complete root coverage can be achieved in class I and class II recession defects. Partial coverage may be achieved in the type of recession represented by class III and IV.
  2. There is little documentation regarding the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results obtained with a connective tissue graft placed.
  3. The treatment of gingival recession defects is indicated for esthetic reasons, to reduce root sensitivity, to remove muscle pull, and to create or augment KT [5]. Since the main indication for root coverage procedures is esthetic/cosmetic demand, the tooth location and tooth type are emphasized in this article

Root coverage was achieved by ADMG + CAF and the patient underwent a 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this case report, mean root coverage obtained at 6 months could not be maintained in the long term. A significant relapse was detected after 10 years, from 80% complete root coverage (CRC) at 6 months to 40% at 10 years As root canal therapy is an invasive procedure, it should be considered as one of the last treatment options for dentinal hypersensitivity. Root coverage procedures A more invasive treatment option for relief from severe tooth hypersensitivity is using a gingival graft for covering the exposed dentinal tubules BACKGROUND Treatment alternatives to cover exposed root surfaces include free grafts, pedicle flaps, and barrier membranes. This 24-month follow-up study clinically evaluated the long-term effect of a coronally advanced flap procedure with the additional use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) to treat gingival recession versus the subpedicle connective tissue graft (CTG) procedure The effect of time on root coverage outcomes: a network meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2019;98:1195-1203. Pini-Prato GP, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Chambrone L. Long ‐ term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession ‐ type defects

Treatment of Miller Class I and II localized recession

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES - SlideShar

Root coverage procedures for treating single and multiple

  1. The results of this systematic review show that subepithelial connective tissue grafts provide significant root coverage, clinical attachment and keratinized tissue gain. Overall comparisons allow us to consider it as the 'gold standard' procedure in the treatment of recession-type defects
  2. Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects. Chambrone L , Sukekava F , Araújo MG , Pustiglioni FE , Chambrone LA , Lima LA Cochrane Database Syst Rev , (2):CD007161, 15 Apr 200
  3. ating the need for vertical releasing incisions
  4. ation performed 6 months after surgical treatment, the mean recession depth had decreased to 0.2 mm in both the test and control groups

(PDF) Root-Coverage Procedures for the Treatment of

The major indications for root coverage procedures are improved esthetics, reduction of root hypersensitivity and the increase of the dimensions of keratinized tissue in order to facilitate infection control and prevent further progression of gingival recession defects The SCTG has been considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession defects. 5 Chambrone et al performed a systematic review of root coverage procedures for localized recession-type defects; for SCTG+CAF they reported a range of 64.7% to 97.3% root coverage and a range of 53% to 89.5% for complete root. Gingival grafting, also called gum grafting or periodontal plastic surgery, is a generic term for the performance of any of a number of periodontal surgical procedures in which the gum tissue is grafted.The aim may be to cover exposed root surfaces or merely to augment the band of keratinized tissue

Clinical Considerations for Root Coverage Procedures

Zucchelli et al. evaluated the effectiveness concerning root coverage of a modified surgical approach of the laterally moved flap procedure with a submarginal incision and mix-thickness flap in the donor site, for the treatment of the isolated type of recession defects (Miller Class I or II). Specific features of the KT lateral to the defects. recession defects. It is safe and can achieve coverage of the root exposure with soft tissue that does not differ from the adjacent soft tissue in terms of color, texture or surface characteristics. Thus it is also the most esthetic root coverage surgical procedure. Recently the CAF has been also applied to the treatment of gingival recession

Highlighted review: Root coverage procedures for the

Z, Buti J, et al. Root coverage proce-dures for treating localised and multi-ple recession-type defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 2;10(10):CD007161. [PubMed] [Crossref] 7. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Ef-ficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review Introduction . The purpose of this case report was to show the clinical long-term stability of a successful two-step root coverage procedure. A combination of two single techniques was used to treat an isolated deep-wide defect. Case Presentation . A 28-year-old female patient was referred in order to treat a single recession defect at #22 in the treatment of single and multiple recession-type defects. They included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only of at least 6 months' duration evaluating recession areas (Miller's Class I or II ≥ 3 mm) and treated by means of root coverage periodontal plastic surgery (RCPPS) procedures. There were 48 RCTs in the review

[11,12]. Although there are numerous available procedures to achieve root coverage, a vascular graft available adjacent to the recession site in sufficient amount is the need of the hour [13]. Recently periosteum has been used for the treatment of gingival recession defects and has revealed promising results over other techniques treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects. Prato GPP1, Franceschi D2, Cortellini PP1,3, Chambrone L4. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun 6. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0619. Abstract BACKGROUND: Subepithelial connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap (SCTG + CAF) has been considered the best and most predictable root coverage procedure. Patient Concerns — Unsatisfactory esthetics is a major reason why patients with gingival recession seek treatment. Hypersensitivity is another chief concern, and it has been shown to be significantly reduced following root coverage procedures. 4,12 In some cases, however, a complete resolution of root sensitivity may require additional treatment, such as a Class V restoration

Coronally Advanced Flap Procedure for Root Coverage

1. Introduction. Periodontal plastic surgeries are performed to prevent or treat anatomical, developmental, traumatic and plaque-induced defects of the gingiva, alveolar mucosa, and bone [].The main characteristic of gingival recession is the apical migration of marginal gingiva, displaced away from the cementoenamel junction (), exposing the root surface to the oral environment treatment of Miller class I and II recession-type defects? Journal of Dentistry 36: 659-671. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. (2010). Root-Coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol; 81: 452-478. Hall WB Recession coverage obtained by ADM represented 84.4% in accordance to the mean root coverage obtained in another study using ADM which was 82.5% . Other studies achieved ≥90% mean recession defect coverage using coronally displaced flap plus ADM [ 35 , 36 ]

Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions

Partial root coverage may be expected for questionable type recession defects. The buccolingual positioning of the implant and the bone volume surrounding the fixture remain as major factors dictating final outcomes. Fig. 3 Systematic review of periodontal plastic surgery in the treatment of multiple recession-type defects. Harem Jaafar. Related Papers. Root-Coverage Procedures for the Treatment of Localized Recession-Type Defects: A Cochrane Systematic Review. By Francisco Pustiglioni and Flávia Sukekava. Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised. - Root coverage - Correction of mucosal defects at implants - Crown lengthening - Gingival preservation at ectopic tooth eruption - Removal of frenulum pull - Prevention of ridge collapse associated with tooth extraction - Augmentation of the edentulous ridg Coverage of Gingival Recession Defects Using Guided Tissue Regeneration With and Without Adjunctive Enamel Matrix Derivative in a Dog Model investigation suggest that the adjunctive use of EMD with GTR promotes formation of new bone and cementum without root resorption in recession-type defects in dogs. Treatment of the Mesial Concavity. that initially shallow recession defects (<4.0 mm) achieved better clinical outcomes than deep recession defects (≥4.0 mm).18 Therefore, further study is needed to determine whether pretreatment recession depth influences root coverage after GTRC. Root conditioning agents have been used in combi-nation with root coverage procedures for their.

Periodontal plastic surgery procedures reduce localized

Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araújo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA: Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: a Cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol. 2010, 81: 452-78. 10.1902/jop.2010.090540. Article PubMed Google Scholar 19 Root coverage procedures The ultimate goal of a root coverage procedure is com-plete coverage of the recession defect with a good appear-ance related to the adjacent soft tissues and minimal probing depth following healing [2] Surgical procedures used in the treatment of recession defects may basically be classified as follows [2] BACKGROUND This study compared 6-month and 3-year outcomes for root coverage (RC) by coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedures in localized gingival recessions. METHODS Two centers, that had participated in a 6-month multinational multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT), followed up 18 patients with 36 Miller Class I and II defects that had been treated in a split-mouth design with CAF.

Comparison of Coronally Advanced Root Coverage Procedure With Collagen Matrix and Connective Tissue Graft collagen matrix and connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recession defects. has shown no studies regarding the use of type 1 sugar cross-linked collagen membrane for treatment of gingival recession. Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD007161. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3. This post is an extended version of the review's plain language summary, compiled by Anne Littlewood at the Cochrane Oral Health Editorial Base The application of a connective tissue graft with epithelial striation (CTG-ES) has been shown to improve the outcome of root coverage (RC) using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) and adjunctive administration of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD). Aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term (mean: 16.19 ± 1.80 years, range: 13 to 18 years) stability of this treatment method with. Background The main goal of root coverage procedure is complete coverage of the recession defect with a good esthetic result related to the adjacent soft tissues and minimal probing depth after the healing process.. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of surgical and nonsurgical treatment options in patients with gingival recession and dentin hypersensitivity (DH)

Gingival recession: part 2

alternative material for root coverage. The purpose of this random-ized clinical trial was to compare these 2 techniques, SCTG versus a GTR-based procedure (GTRC), for root coverage/recession treat-ment. Methods: Sixteen patients with bilateral Miller's Class I or II (gin-gival recession ≥3.0 mm) recession defects were treated either wit results obtained with different root-coverage procedures in the treatment of MRTDs and to assess differences in results from RCTs and other types of studies (i.e., degree of concordance in treatment effects between randomized in the treatment of multiple recession-type defects Connective tissue graft (CTG) is considered to be the best root coverage techniques for the treatment of gingival recession defects. However, it is challenging sometimes to harvest the largest volume of tissue especially in thin palatal tissue as recently it was recommended to keep 2mm of soft tissue thickness covering the palate to minimize. Root coverage (RC) procedures have long been used for the treatment of gingival recession (GR). During daily practice, clinicians are required to deal with diverse clinical scenarios and to provide the most adequate treatment options for each particular condition based on the best evidence available, the clinician's skills, and the patients. SCTG provided substantial root coverage, clinical attachment, and keratinised tissue gain and could be considered to be the gold standard for treatment of recession-type defects. CRD commentary The objectives and inclusion criteria were clear and relevant sources were searched for trials

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Grafts in the Treatment of

1. Chambrone L, Sukekava F, Araujo MG, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Root coverage procedures for the treatment of localised recession-type defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD007161. [ Links ] 2. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review Aesthetic Periodontal Therapy and Root Coverage 1. Introduction - Aesthetic considerations have influenced the management of dental maladies in varying degrees for many years. - For many years the goals of periodontal surgery have been determined by functional aspects only. - During recent years periodontal surgery has shifted its focus from achieving more functional [

Fibrin glue application in conjunction with tetracycline root conditioning and coronally positioned flap procedure in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23. The aim of the treatment for gingival recession should be to address the patient's concerns of sensitivity and/or aesthetics. The treatment options available include: 1. Monitoring and prevention. periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S63-76. 3. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. 4. Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, et al. Twenty year Gingival recession is the exposure of root surface due to the apical migration of gingival tissue margins. Root coverage is indicated for esthetics improvement,1 proper plaque control2 and root hypersensitivity management.3 Several techniques have been developed to obtain predictable and esthetic root coverage.4‒7 Sub